Health Care in the U.S. in the 21st
Century:
Inspiring Innovations that Disrupt The Status Quo---
A Response and View From the 74126
Inspiring Innovations that Disrupt The Status Quo---
A Response and View From the 74126
Ron Robinson
(Photo above, taken in our community gardenpark and orchard we are creating here; for the purposes of this post, it is a photo of a physician delivering innovative health care here in the 74126)
(Photo above, taken in our community gardenpark and orchard we are creating here; for the purposes of this post, it is a photo of a physician delivering innovative health care here in the 74126)
Some bottom lines about health and
the U.S.: What contributes to making a real difference in the health of people
in our nation?
51 percent of health comes from lifestyle choices,
20 percent from genetics,
19 percent from the environment,
and only 10 percent from the health care delivery system (data from the presentation mentioned below)
And yet, of course, what is spent to effect change in health care in those areas is not anywhere near proportionate to what in fact makes the difference. We are stuck in an institutional, attractional model, that is maintanence rather than mission based. But, there are seeds of new endeavors underway to try to re-orient us (connected issue but also separate from this are the issues of the health care insurance and coverage of uninsured in our country; won’t get into that here; but if Governor Fallin is serious about looking beyond the box and trying innovative local plans to improve health outcomes that do not involve insurance coverage, then she should pay attention to what is said here and what is going on in these new seedbeds of innovation). Of course, good things are happening and health is being improved through the current institutions, but it is out of whack when it comes to comparing outcomes and costs.
51 percent of health comes from lifestyle choices,
20 percent from genetics,
19 percent from the environment,
and only 10 percent from the health care delivery system (data from the presentation mentioned below)
And yet, of course, what is spent to effect change in health care in those areas is not anywhere near proportionate to what in fact makes the difference. We are stuck in an institutional, attractional model, that is maintanence rather than mission based. But, there are seeds of new endeavors underway to try to re-orient us (connected issue but also separate from this are the issues of the health care insurance and coverage of uninsured in our country; won’t get into that here; but if Governor Fallin is serious about looking beyond the box and trying innovative local plans to improve health outcomes that do not involve insurance coverage, then she should pay attention to what is said here and what is going on in these new seedbeds of innovation). Of course, good things are happening and health is being improved through the current institutions, but it is out of whack when it comes to comparing outcomes and costs.
This conversation stems from being privileged
to attend a presentation at OU Tulsa yesterday that looked at some key aspects
of our health care situation in the United States, particularly regarding the
inability to see changes to our life expectancy especially when connected with
the costs of care, and that mapped out some of the steps being taken to try to
step away from the current system. This is especially important here as we live
and have our community renewal efforts in the 74126 zip code, one of the ones
with the lowest life expectancy in the Tulsa region, some 14 years lower than
in midtown Tulsa just a few miles south of the 74126. Plus, we at the A Third
Place Community Foundation have been working on these issues since our founding
in 2009, with our mission of growing healthy lives and neighborhoods in our
area (note the connection we make between the health of the two, people’s lives
and their neighborhoods; can’t separate them).
This took on critical function when
we hosted an OU Community Health Clinic, which was closed in winter 2011, and
as we sought ways to replace clinic-based health care with ways that were “disruptively
innovative” to the status quo and the system that perpetuates it, partnering in
research and focus groups in our community toward a lay community health worker
proposal, where the community worker lives in the neighborhood targeted for
better health outcomes. And my interest
in these issues has been personal since I used to work with the OU Health
Sciences Center years ago, and my wife is a graduate of OU Medical School and
one of the few physicians (maybe the only one, we don’t know) who lives in the
74126. Health concerns underlie our major projects in our community foundation
through the creation of the community garden and orchard and the community
center. It is also why we are working with the Tulsa Health Department and its
new Wellness Center in our area that opened its doors after our clinic closed,
as well as with McLain High School and the healty living grant and the Taste of
North Tulsa event; our food pantry with our weekly nutrition class and other
programs is better named The Health Hub, and just about every program and
partner we work with is directly connected to community health in the 74126 and
other zips in our service area north of 46th St. Our latest project to get a senior citizens program and center going in our area is also at heart health related. People in community live longer and more abundantly, and in doing so, give back to the community itself.
Before I get into my take-aways from
today’s presentation, and what my response and questions would have been to the
inspiring presenters, here is what I have written about these issues, often,
during the past eight years we have lived in the 74126. Here is a link to a few
of the earlier works about some of our projects and the lay community health
worker proposal in particular; you might want to check them out for further reflection after reading this one:
The powerpoint presentation on
community health workers, which I had not posted before: http://www.scribd.com/doc/124103581/Community-Health-Workers
Blogposts on health care in our area
and projects we have been involved with:
and the related http://progressivechurchplanting.blogspot.com/2010/08/disruptive-innovation-for-real.html.
Also the lecture I gave at OU in
Norman that looked at our area in a comprehensive way and what we were doing at
the time collaboratively to make a difference: http://turleyok.blogspot.com/2010/10/ou-lecture-pragmatics-of-collaboration.html
Now on to the most recent
conversation at OU yesterday…
1.
They didn’t use the precise term but
I liked that in essence they, physicians and health care and economics leaders who
had gone through a Masters program at Dartmouth, were talking about the need to
expand the bandwidth of how health care is delivered. That is in itself a good
way to look at how to make the changes necessary, which often seem clear but
too major to be undertaken. The community health care worker plan they later
mentioned, as one of the small steps needed, is just one of the places for this
expanded way of delivering health care. I am going to talk below about an even
more radical, and basic, but simpler way as well.
2.
In looking at the differences in
different communities about how care is delivered and where, such as what
percent die in hospitals, in hospices, in nursing homes, in their own homes, or
elsewhere, one of the things not addressed directly yesterday and that leaped
out to me that I would have loved to go more in depth about was about how hard
it is to track the outcomes of health in a community that, like ours, is poor
and underserved and with low life expectancy, hard to track and hard to design
plans for because of the high mobility and turnover of the people in the
community, and the diversity even within us. We have some who have lived in
this zip code all their lives, and some who only will for a month, and the
percentages of those is growing more equal, meaning the community is becoming
less stable.
Related to this is that very important truth that there are big differences in values and approaches and “class” perspectives among the very residents here, and these are big determinants on how residents trust, or not, the health care system now in place, and what they think of regarding their own health options and their willingness or reluctance to go to a doctor for what is generally considered preventive care or primary care, even if they, for example, lived next door to a 24/7 facility; there are differences if it is a walk-in anytime clinic as opposed to one where you have to make an appointment first, an act itself that is viewed as a barrier and difficulty for some. We have here differences of those who grew up middle class with its values and even though they are now poor, and perhaps new to the area, still have middle class attitudes toward themselves and their options; we have those who are multi-generationally in poverty who have different stances and responses; and we have those who are or were working class and who have assets that are above poverty line. So, any health care approach that considers people to be representative, even among their own neighborhood, will end up misconnecting; treatment for someone will vary due to culture and geography and economic condition, and will vary in a zipcode like ours as well. So, the bottom line here is that health care professionals, and planners, need to really, really know an area they want to make a difference in. more on what that entails below.
Related to this is that very important truth that there are big differences in values and approaches and “class” perspectives among the very residents here, and these are big determinants on how residents trust, or not, the health care system now in place, and what they think of regarding their own health options and their willingness or reluctance to go to a doctor for what is generally considered preventive care or primary care, even if they, for example, lived next door to a 24/7 facility; there are differences if it is a walk-in anytime clinic as opposed to one where you have to make an appointment first, an act itself that is viewed as a barrier and difficulty for some. We have here differences of those who grew up middle class with its values and even though they are now poor, and perhaps new to the area, still have middle class attitudes toward themselves and their options; we have those who are multi-generationally in poverty who have different stances and responses; and we have those who are or were working class and who have assets that are above poverty line. So, any health care approach that considers people to be representative, even among their own neighborhood, will end up misconnecting; treatment for someone will vary due to culture and geography and economic condition, and will vary in a zipcode like ours as well. So, the bottom line here is that health care professionals, and planners, need to really, really know an area they want to make a difference in. more on what that entails below.
3.
One of the best questions that the
presenters raised, in light of the points made immediately before this, is how
do different people answer the question of “what does it mean to be healthy?”
That is going to vary widely. It is something we need to ask more often here on
the ground in the community as well. What I have noticed is that it will be a
different response than what will be given by someone not in poverty: for me,
for example, when I answer that question I think about how being healthy allows
me to live in advance, to make long range plans, to carry out goals for me and
others around me, to keep a career; in essence, to be healthy is not to have to
be thinking about whether I am healthy or not. For many of my neighbors when we
talk about things like this, I can tell that it means, like so many things,
being able to live subsistently day to day with the ability to enjoy a respite
now and then and a small pleasure now and then or be around others for a good
time; in essence, for the day to just be a little easier because so many things
are naturally hard in it to accomplish, such as keeping a child in school,
being able to go hunt for work, etc. Health care professionals need to know
these differences and account for them.
4.
Where can health care happen? One of
the needed shifts underway that was mentioned in the presentation is the need
to move from “rescue care to health care.” (others were moving from fee-based
service to risk-based contracting; and the development of the primary care
patient-centered medical home and care coordination, and reducing variability).
I thought of this move from rescue care, which we in the U.S. do well, to
health care and thought of those percentages above about what really affects
health care life expectancy outcomes, and I thought of how we need to
de-institutionalize and de-centralize health care and move that ten percent
into the 51 percent lifestyle change category. What I really thought about is
how my wife, a physician, delivers health care to our neighbors when she meets them
and talks with them at the community center, and especially while in the garden
or orchard, at the community events; just building relationships with them,
listening to them, and out of that relationship when suffering arises she is able
to respond, be it with information, resources, advice, looking at a cut or rash
or hurt leg, the same way a knowledgeable family member would in some places,
or in some times; and just in helping to create healthier environments and
lifestyle choices of healthier food and community she is involved in delivering
real health care outcomes in this unhealthy area the same as when she sees
someone from this area in her own practice located across town (at the VA). I
will say that her patients in the clinic who do live in the 74126 seem to be
better patients and taking care of themselves and trust her advice more and are
more compliant, as they say, with followup actions once they find out where she
lives, when they see her in the grocery store or at a community event. This is
one of the ways that the future of health care is reclaiming a culture of
health care from the past. The catchword now for it is cultural competency,
knowing something about them in a wholistic way.
And it is important to note that health care is being delivered, in such a way, by many people here, and in our wider community, by people who do not have medical careers; it is very true that a lot of the health problems in our area are also caused by the spread of misinformation on health matters. The key is to unlock the strengths of community connections and trust, and build on them with a little training, and using right information to spread in the community (where word of mouth, and personal relationships are the currency). All of which is testament to why the community health workers, health coaches, lay advocates, whatever you want to call those who will be partners in health with those most in need and without anyone serving that function from their family or their community connections already, why they must be people who live in the area where those seeking care come from.
It is also why, if I had been asked yesterday what I thought would make the most difference in health care from the medical school, I would answer with the simple but radical response: tell your graduates to move and live in areas of high poverty, add to the diversity of those neighborhoods, learn from them, make a difference in that 51 percent category even if you make your living still in that 10 percent category; you can do it and you can make it happen; we are proof of it. Also, give your employees in health care institutions bonuses, merit pay, for choosing to live in the areas where the patients with the least resources live, and where they can be a part of that informal, community grassroots health delivery. If health care, especially, is more of a calling, a vocation, and not just a profession, and certainly not just a job, then be open to the nature of a call. Talk about “disruptive innovation” and helping to shift the focus and locus of health care…or we can continue to tinker and plan and rearrange the chairs on the Titanic.
This is also why there is a connection between the health of the community and the health of the neighborhood schools, why we need to be ble to graduate students from McLain high school now who can and will go on to become nurses and doctors and other health professionals, the same as happened when my wife was a McLain graduate. To grow health in the 74126, make our schools in the area healthier and give them the resources and the curriculum offerings to produce graduates who will not be scared to remain or return to the area to live and work and be a part of that important community informal day to day life.
And it is important to note that health care is being delivered, in such a way, by many people here, and in our wider community, by people who do not have medical careers; it is very true that a lot of the health problems in our area are also caused by the spread of misinformation on health matters. The key is to unlock the strengths of community connections and trust, and build on them with a little training, and using right information to spread in the community (where word of mouth, and personal relationships are the currency). All of which is testament to why the community health workers, health coaches, lay advocates, whatever you want to call those who will be partners in health with those most in need and without anyone serving that function from their family or their community connections already, why they must be people who live in the area where those seeking care come from.
It is also why, if I had been asked yesterday what I thought would make the most difference in health care from the medical school, I would answer with the simple but radical response: tell your graduates to move and live in areas of high poverty, add to the diversity of those neighborhoods, learn from them, make a difference in that 51 percent category even if you make your living still in that 10 percent category; you can do it and you can make it happen; we are proof of it. Also, give your employees in health care institutions bonuses, merit pay, for choosing to live in the areas where the patients with the least resources live, and where they can be a part of that informal, community grassroots health delivery. If health care, especially, is more of a calling, a vocation, and not just a profession, and certainly not just a job, then be open to the nature of a call. Talk about “disruptive innovation” and helping to shift the focus and locus of health care…or we can continue to tinker and plan and rearrange the chairs on the Titanic.
This is also why there is a connection between the health of the community and the health of the neighborhood schools, why we need to be ble to graduate students from McLain high school now who can and will go on to become nurses and doctors and other health professionals, the same as happened when my wife was a McLain graduate. To grow health in the 74126, make our schools in the area healthier and give them the resources and the curriculum offerings to produce graduates who will not be scared to remain or return to the area to live and work and be a part of that important community informal day to day life.
5.
I like that the folks at OU are looking at all
this, and others are across the country; that they are committed to exploring
small projects to try to seed change; that they are open to such questions as
how many physicians should we be paying to educate if we don’t see major
changes in health outcomes especially among our poorest, and I would say, if
physicians and institutions continue to take the safe and convenient route with
least change to “the way we have done it.” I think more physicians actually
might be the key, especially as population grows, and as it becomes more
diverse, and especially given the vast physician deserts like here in the
74126. The question has arisen for us, for example: why given the current
health care system is it virtually impossible for my wife to open up a practice
here in the 74126 where she so would like, or have liked, to do so, as she did on
her own in Tahlequah, OK years ago when completing her residency in internal
medicine and going to be the only M.D. internist there? Why, given the health
problems here and low life expectancy here, is it the hardest to have an OU
clinic, or a private medical clinic, here? Answering that unveils the realities
of the situation. Making it easier to do so would seem to be part of the
solution. The other part of the solution is to not be physician-focused,
clinic-focused either (I love that we now in our zipcode have the new OSU
physicians clinic in the new Health Dept. building opening up, but it is going
to face the same set of cultural barriers, attitudes toward one’s self and one’s
view of what health means). I like how OU, and I suppose OSU, and Morton with
its new plan for health coaches, and the Health Dept with its commitment to our
area are all beginning it seems to take some small steps in trying to figure
this all out, and due to the necessity that just knowing what to do is but a
small part of the problem, since funds are being cut, Medicaid coverage is
being kept from expanding, and those lifestyle choices and environmental
realities that mean so much to health are also not being funded. When you live
on the same block, or go by everyday, rows of abandoned houses, burned out
houses and buildings, and have no sidewalks, few street lights, no ability to exercise
where you can get to easily and are not hassled by stray dogs, etc , and when
you add to that the deep issues of substance abuse, addictions, mental health
issues, learning disabilities, lack of resources for the high percentage of
incarcerated people getting out and coming into our area, and we remember that
axiom we began with, from our mission statement, that healthy lives require
healthy neighborhoods, and healthy neighborhood schools, and civic and church
groups, and those require healthy lives. As I have talked recently about school
transformations, (and in my other hats, have talked about church
transformations), what goes on outside of a health care office, in the home and
neighborhood of the person seeking care, is more important to creating health
than what even goes on inside the office in the 15 to 30 minute to at most hour
together, or in the hospitals.
6.
My final takeaway was just a notion,
a small detail, that arose when the conversation focused on the role of the
internet and technology, and sharing information, etc. in the new world
emerging for health care delivery. While they were talking in those big terms,
all good and needed and helpful, I was thinking how we could really use a text
message database that sent out news, reminders, tips, free from us and from
health caregivers to all those who are poor and out of usual means of
communication and contact and who will only attend health classes or lifestyle
classes, etc. if mandated to be there. Most of our neighbors have now phones
(as vital as horses once were here, and for many of the same reasons, to keep
in touch and connected with others) and I would love to be able to build on
that basic technological tool; there are so many ways that health-driven text
messages, info, resources, all could affect their lives, a small but
significant way. We need to try to build that into our system here from the
ground up, but would be an interesting project to explore with others its
application possibilities and ramifications.
It has been great
having OU as one of our community health partners. Some of our board members are
going out to OU today to meet with a class of graduate social work students
doing service learning projects with us later this month too back in the 74126.
Love to do the same with other groups.
No comments:
Post a Comment